The War Hawks—the new wave of Congressmen who had come to
power during the first part of Madison’s Presidency—heavily influenced the
United States’ decision to attack Canada and to go to war with Great Britain in
1812. To be sure, the United
States of the early 1800’s was facing conflicts with the Indians in the new
territory gained in the Louisiana Purchase (1803) and in the Northwest
Territory (1785, 1787) and the British supported the Indians to some
extent. Moreover, the British had
been directly threatening U.S. ships and sailors with impressment and
indirectly threatening the United States’ manufacturers with the far more
developed British shipping fleet. The U.S. also still faced the direct threat
of the presence of British Loyalists in Canada. However, the war also resulted in several disastrous
battles, wanton destruction on U.S. soil including the burning of Washington
D.C., 6,000 Americans wounded or killed, and an initial divide between the
political parties and the eventual collapse of the alternative voice of the
Federalists. And all that for a
war that ended with both countries returning all of their conquered territory.
With that said, A) do you agree or disagree with the War
Hawks’ decision to start a war? If
you agree, why? If you disagree, why? And B) Whatever the case, do you think
the War Hawks’ policy was justified? If so, why? If not, why?
Please use your book and cite from it at least twice in
using concrete historical examples to support a thoughtful response to these
questions in AT LEAST 10 STRONG SENTENCES (10 SENTENCES TOTAL IN ANSWERING BOTH QUESTIONS -- NOT 20). Posts must be completed by 12:30PM on Wednesday.
Posts submitted on time and according to the requirements
will receive 10 POINTS as always (which is the equivalent of a very short quiz
so you know). Thanks so much and
looking forward to reading.